43 research outputs found

    Evaluating the drivers of and obstacles to the willingness to use cognitive enhancement drugs: the influence of drug characteristics, social environment, and personal characteristics

    Get PDF
    Sattler S, Mehlkop G, Graeff P, Sauer C. Evaluating the drivers of and obstacles to the willingness to use cognitive enhancement drugs: the influence of drug characteristics, social environment, and personal characteristics. Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy. 2014;9(1): 8.Background The use of cognitive enhancement (CE) by means of pharmaceutical agents has been the subject of intense debate both among scientists and in the media. This study investigates several drivers of and obstacles to the willingness to use prescription drugs non-medically for augmenting brain capacity. Methods We conducted a web-based study among 2,877 students from randomly selected disciplines at German universities. Using a factorial survey, respondents expressed their willingness to take various hypothetical CE-drugs; the drugs were described by five experimentally varied characteristics and the social environment by three varied characteristics. Personal characteristics and demographic controls were also measured. Results We found that 65.3% of the respondents staunchly refused to use CE-drugs. The results of a multivariate negative binomial regression indicated that respondents’ willingness to use CE-drugs increased if the potential drugs promised a significant augmentation of mental capacity and a high probability of achieving this augmentation. Willingness decreased when there was a high probability of side effects and a high price. Prevalent CE-drug use among peers increased willingness, whereas a social environment that strongly disapproved of these drugs decreased it. Regarding the respondents’ characteristics, pronounced academic procrastination, high cognitive test anxiety, low intrinsic motivation, low internalization of social norms against CE-drug use, and past experiences with CE-drugs increased willingness. The potential severity of side effects, social recommendations about using CE-drugs, risk preferences, and competencies had no measured effects upon willingness. Conclusions These findings contribute to understanding factors that influence the willingness to use CE-drugs. They support the assumption of instrumental drug use and may contribute to the development of prevention, policy, and educational strategies

    Engineering strategy and vector library for the rapid generation of modular light-controlled protein–protein interactions

    No full text
    Optogenetics enables the spatio-temporally precise control of cell and animal behavior. Many optogenetic tools are driven by light-controlled protein–protein interactions (PPIs) that are repurposed from natural light-sensitive domains (LSDs). Applying light-controlled PPIs to new target proteins is challenging because it is difficult to predict which of the many available LSDs, if any, will yield robust light regulation. As a consequence, fusion protein libraries need to be prepared and tested, but methods and platforms to facilitate this process are currently not available. Here, we developed a genetic engineering strategy and vector library for the rapid generation of light-controlled PPIs. The strategy permits fusing a target protein to multiple LSDs efficiently and in two orientations. The public and expandable library contains 29 vectors with blue, green or red light-responsive LSDs, many of which have been previously applied ex vivo and in vivo. We demonstrate the versatility of the approach and the necessity for sampling LSDs by generating light-activated caspase-9 (casp9) enzymes. Collectively, this work provides a new resource for optical regulation of a broad range of target proteins in cell and developmental biology

    Taxation

    No full text
    An amino acid sequence alignment of JellyOp WT (Genbank AB435549) from squid rhodopsin (X70498.1) and bovine rhodopsin (NM_000024). Boundaries of the transmembrane regions are highlighted in grey. The lysine residue in TM7, which forms a Schiff-base linkage with the retinaldehyde chromophore, is boxed. The JellyOp residue F112, which is substituted for alanine in the JellyOp F112A mutant, is highlighted in green [59, 60]. (TIF 49066 kb

    Convergent evolution of tertiary structure in rhodopsin visual proteins from vertebrates and box jellyfish

    No full text
    Box jellyfish and vertebrates are separated by >500 million years of evolution yet have structurally analogous lens eyes that employ rhodopsin photopigments for vision. All opsins possess a negatively charged residue—the counterion—to maintain visible-light sensitivity and facilitate photoisomerization of their retinaldehyde chromophore. In vertebrate rhodopsins, the molecular evolution of the counterion position—from a highly conserved distal location in the second extracellular loop (E181) to a proximal location in the third transmembrane helix (E113)—is established as a key driver of higher fidelity photoreception. Here, we use computational biology and heterologous action spectroscopy to determine whether the appearance of the advanced visual apparatus in box jellyfish was also accompanied by changes in the opsin tertiary structure. We found that the counterion in an opsin from the lens eye of the box jellyfish Carybdea rastonii (JellyOp) has also moved to a unique proximal location within the transmembrane bundle—E94 in TM2. Furthermore, we reveal that this Schiff base/counterion system includes an additional positive charge—R186—that has coevolved with E94 to functionally separate E94 and E181 in the chromophore-binding pocket of JellyOp. By engineering this pocket—neutralizing R186 and E94, or swapping E94 with the vertebrate counterion E113—we can recreate versions of the invertebrate and vertebrate counterion systems, respectively, supporting a relatively similar overall architecture in this region of animal opsins. In summary, our data establish the third only counterion site in animal opsins and reveal convergent evolution of tertiary structure in opsins from distantly related species with advanced visual systems.ISSN:0027-8424ISSN:1091-649

    Optogenetic interrogation reveals separable G-protein-dependent and -independent signalling linking G-protein-coupled receptors to the circadian oscillator

    No full text
    Abstract Background Endogenous circadian oscillators distributed across the mammalian body are synchronised among themselves and with external time via a variety of signalling molecules, some of which interact with G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). GPCRs can regulate cell physiology via pathways originating with heterotrimeric G-proteins or ÎČ-arrestins. We applied an optogenetic approach to determine the contribution of these two signalling modes on circadian phase. Results We employed a photopigment (JellyOp) that activates Gαs signalling with better selectivity and higher sensitivity than available alternatives, and a point mutant of this pigment (F112A) biased towards ÎČ-arrestin signalling. When expressed in fibroblasts, both native JellyOp and the F112A arrestin-biased mutant drove light-dependent phase resetting in the circadian clock. Shifts induced by the two opsins differed in their circadian phase dependence and the degree to which they were associated with clock gene induction. Conclusions Our data imply separable G-protein and arrestin inputs to the mammalian circadian clock and establish a pair of optogenetic tools suitable for manipulating Gαs- and ÎČ-arrestin-biased signalling in live cells
    corecore